Bibliography

Sources cited by articles in The Philosopher's Meme.

237 sources

  1. Alvarez, A. (2004). Memetics: An evolutionary theory of cultural transmission. Sorites, 15, 24–28.

    Cited by article

  2. Aunger, R. (ed.) (2001). Darwinizing Culture: The Status of Memetics as a Science. Oxford University Press.

    Cited by article

  3. Baldwin, J., (1898). On Selective Thinking. Psychological Review, 5.1 (January 1898): 1-24.

    Cited by article

  4. Benzon, W. (1996). Culture as an evolutionary arena. Journal of Social and Evolutionary Systems, 19, 321–62.

    Cited by article

  5. Berry, David. The computational turn: thinking about the digital humanities. Culture Machine. 2011.

    Cited by article

  6. Blackmore, S. (1999). The Meme Machine, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Cited by article

  7. Blackmore, S. (2000). The memes' eye view. In R. Aunger (Ed.), Darwinizing Culture: The Status of Memetics as a Science. Oxford University Press.

    Cited by article

  8. Bloch M. (2001). A well-disposed social anthropologist’s problems with memes. In: Darwinizing Culture: The Status of Memetics as a Science. Oxford University Press.

    Cited by article

  9. Boluk, Stephanie and Lemieux, Patrick. Metagaming: Playing, Competing, Spectating, Cheating, Trading, Making, and Breaking Videogames. University of Minnesota Press. 2017.

    Cited by article

  10. Börzsei, L. (2013). Makes a Meme Instead: A Concise History of Internet Memes, New Media Studies Magazine, Issue 7.

    Cited by article

  11. Boyd, R., Richerson, P. (2001). Memes: Universal acid or a better mousetrap? In Darwinizing Culture: The Status of Memetics as a Science. Oxford University Press.

    Cited by article

  12. Bundy, Alan. Automated theorem proving: a practical tool for the working mathematician?. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence. 2011.

    Cited by article

  13. Burman, J. T. (2012). The misunderstanding of memes: Biography of an unscientific object, 1976-1999, Perspectives on Science.

    Cited by article

  14. Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., & Feldman, M. W. (1981). Cultural transmission and evolution: a quantitative approach. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.

    Cited by article

  15. Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., & Feldman, M. W. (1981). Cultural Transmission and Evolution: A Quantitative Approach. Princeton University Press.

    Cited by article

  16. Chess, Shira and Shaw, Adrienne. A Conspiracy of Fishes, or, How We Learned to Stop Worrying About #GamerGate and Embrace Hegemonic Masculinity. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. 2015.

    Cited by article

  17. Claidere, N., Scott-Phillips, T. C., Sperber, D. (2014). How Darwinian is cultural evolution? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. 369: 20130368. DOI:10.1098/rstb.2013.0368.

    Cited by article

  18. Consigny, Scott. Nietzsche's reading of the sophists. Rhetoric Review. 1994.

    Cited by article

  19. Conte, R. (2001). 'Memes through (social) minds', in: Aunger, R. (eds.) Darwinizing Culture: The Status of Memetics as a Science. pp.83-119. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780192632449.001.0001

    Cited by article

  20. Cullen B. (1998). "Parasite Ecology and the Evolution of Religion", in: Heylighen F., Bollen J. & Riegler A. (eds.) (1999). The Evolution of Complexity. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht

    Cited by article

  21. Cullen, B. (1993). ‘The Darwinian Resurgence and the Cultural Virus Critique’, Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 3(2), pp. 179–202. doi: 10.1017/S0959774300000834.

    Cited by article

  22. Cummins, Robert. Neo-Teleology. Philosophy of Biology: An Anthology. 2010.

    Cited by article

  23. Dawkins , R. (1993). Viruses of the Mind. In B. Dahlbom. (ed.) Dennett and His Critics. Cambridge: Blackwell.

    Cited by article

  24. Dawkins, R. (1976). The Selfish Gene, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Cited by article

  25. Dawkins, R. (1982b). Replicators and vehicles. Current problems in sociobiology, 45: 45-64.

    Cited by article

  26. Dawkins, R. (1982a). The Extended Phenotype, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Cited by article

  27. Dawkins, R. (1983). Universal Darwinism. In: Evolution from molecules to man, ed. D. S. Bendall. Cambridge University Press.

    Cited by article

  28. Dawkins, R. (1986). The Blind Watchmaker, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Cited by article

  29. Dawkins, R. (1989). The Selfish Gene, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Cited by article

  30. Dawkins, R. (2003). A Devil's Chaplain: Reflections on Hope, Lies, Science and Love. Mariner Books. Boston, New York.

    Cited by article

  31. Dawkins, R. (2006). The Selfish Gene (30th Anniversary Edition), Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Cited by article

  32. Dawkins, Richard. The Selfish Gene. Oxford and New York, Oxford University Press, 1989 189-201.

    Cited by article

  33. Dennett, D. (1995). Darwin's Dangerous Idea, Sciences 35.3 (May 1995): 34.

    Cited by article

  34. Dirlam, D. K. (2005). Using memetics to grow memetics. Journal of Memetics–Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission, 9(1).

    Cited by article

  35. Edmonds, B., (2002). Three Challenges for the Survival of Memetics. Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission, 6

    Cited by article

  36. Edmonds, B., (2005). The revealed poverty of the gene-meme analogy - why memetics per se has failed to produce substantive results. Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission, 9

    Cited by article

  37. Evnine, Simon J. “The Anonymity of a Murmur: Internet (and Other) Memes.” The British Journal of Aesthetics, 58(3), 2018, 303-318.

    Cited by article

  38. Gatherer, D. (1998). Why the Thought Contagion Metaphor is Retarding the Progress of Memetics. Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission;1998, Vol. 2 Issue 2, p32

    Cited by article

  39. Gray, R. D., Greenhill, S. J., Ross, R. M. (2007) The Pleasures and Perils of Darwinizing Culture (with Phylogenies). Biological Theory, 2(4), pp. 360-375.

    Cited by article

  40. Haack, Susan. Manifesto of a Passionate Moderate. 1998.

    Cited by article

  41. Hintikka, Jaakko. What is abduction? The fundamental problem of contemporary epistemology. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society. 1998.

    Cited by article

  42. Hull, D. (1980). Individuality and Selection, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, Vol. 11, pp. 311-332.

    Cited by article

  43. Hull, D. L. (2000). Taking memetics seriously: Memetics will be what we make it. In R. Aunger (Ed.), Darwinizing Culture: The Status of Memetics as a Science. Oxford University Press.

    Cited by article

  44. Huntington, H. E. (2013). Big Bird, Binders Full of Women & Bayonets and Horses: The Diffusion of Internet Memes in Mainstream Media Coverage of the 2012 U.S. Presidential Campaign. Presented at the National Popular Culture/American Culture Conference, March 27-30 Washington, D.C.

    Cited by article

  45. Keogh, Brendan. Game of moans: the death throes of the male gamer. Overland literary journal. 2014.

    Cited by article

  46. Knobel, M., Lankshear, L. (2005). Memes and affinities: Cultural replication and literacy education.

    Cited by article

  47. Kuipers, Giselinde. “Media culture and Internet disaster jokes.” European Journal of Cultural Studies, 5(4), 2002, 450-470.

    Cited by article

  48. Marcus, O. R., Singer, M. (2016). Loving Ebola-chan: Internet memes in an epidemic. Media, Culture & Society. pp. 1-6. DOI: 10.1177/0163443716646174

    Cited by article

  49. Milner, R. (2012). The World Made Meme. MIT Press.

    Cited by article

  50. Milner, R. (2013a). “Hacking the Social: Internet Memes, Identity Antagonism, and the Logic of Lulz.” The Fibreculture Journal 22 (Trolls and The Negative Space of the Internet).

    Cited by article

  51. Milner, Ryan, "Logics: The Fundamentals of Memetic Participation." In The World Made Meme

    Cited by article

  52. Milner, Ryan. The World Made Meme: Public Conversations And Participatory Media. MIT Press, 2016.

    Cited by article

  53. Miltner, K. (2011). Srsly Phenomenal: An Investigation into the Appeal of LOLcats. Unpublished master's dissertation, London School of Economics.

    Cited by article

  54. Miltner, K. (2014). “‘There’s No Place for Lulz on LOLCats’: The Role of Genre, Gender, and Group Identity in the Interpretation and Enjoyment of an Internet Meme.” First Monday 19 (8).

    Cited by article

  55. Mitchell, P. (2012). Contagious Metaphor, Bloomsbury Academic.

    Cited by article

  56. Mortensen, Torill Elvira. Anger, Fear, and Games: The Long Event of #GamerGate. Games and Culture. 2018.

    Cited by article

  57. O'Brien, M. J., Lyman, R. L., Mesoudi, A., VanPool, T. L. (2010) Cultural traits as units of analysis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. Volume 365, Issue 1559. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0012

    Cited by article

  58. Phillips, W. (2012b). The house that fox built: Anonymous, spectacle and cycles of amplification. Television and New Media, 14(6), 494–509.

    Cited by article

  59. Rorty, Richard. Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. 1989.

    Cited by article

  60. Schiller, Ferdinand Canning Scott. Plato or Protagoras?: Being a critical examination of the Protagoras speech in the Theaetetus with some remarks upon error. B. H. Blackwell. 1908.

    Cited by article

  61. Segev, E., Nissenbaum, A., Stolero, N., Shifman, L (2015). Families and Networks of Internet Memes: The Relationship Between Cohesiveness, Uniqueness, and Quiddity Concreteness. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. pp. 417-433. Doi:10.1111/jcc4.12120

    Cited by article

  62. Shifman, L. (2012). An anatomy of a YouTube meme. New Media & Society, 14(2), 187–203. doi:10.1177/1461444811412160

    Cited by article

  63. Shifman, L. (2013a). Memes in a digital world: Reconciling with a conceptual troublemaker. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18(3), 362–377.

    Cited by article

  64. Cited by articles

  65. Shifman, L., Thelwall, M. (2009). Assessing Global Diffusion with Web Memetics: The Spread and Evolution of a Popular Joke. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. Volume 60, Issue 12. pp. 2567-2576. DOI:10.1002/asi.21185

    Cited by article

  66. Shifman, Limor. Memes In Digital Culture. Boca Raton, CRC Press, 2015.

    Cited by article

  67. Sober, E. (1980). Evolution, population thinking, and essentialism. Philosophy of Science, 47(3), 350-383.

    Cited by article

  68. Sober, E. (1984). The Nature of Selection: Evolutionary Theory in Philosophical Focus. University of Chicago Press.

    Cited by article

  69. Sperber, D. (1985). Anthropology and psychology: Towards an epidemiology of representations. Man, 20(1), 73-89.

    Cited by article

  70. Sperber, D. (2000). An objection to the memetic approach to culture. In R. Aunger (Ed.), Darwinizing Culture: The Status of Memetics as a Science. Oxford University Press.

    Cited by article

  71. Steinberger, Peter. Who is Cephalus?. Political Theory. 1996.

    Cited by article

  72. Sterelny, K., & Griffiths, P. (1999). Sex and death: an introduction to philosophy of biology. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press.

    Cited by article

  73. Tipton, Jason A.. Philosophical Biology in Aristotle's Parts of Animals. 2014.

    Cited by article

  74. Uhlíř, V. Stella, M. (2012). Who needs memetics? Possible developments of the meme concept and beyond. Anthropologie (Brno) 50, 1: 127-142

    Cited by article

  75. Uidhir, Christy Mag. The Epistemic Misuse and Abuse of Pictorial Caricature. American Philosophical Quarterly. 2013.

    Cited by article

  76. Weitz, Morris. “The Role of Theory in Aesthetics.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 15(1), 1956, 27-35.

    Cited by article

  77. Wiggins, B., Bowers, G. (2014). Memes as genre: A structural analysis of the memescape. New Media.

    Cited by article

  78. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Investigations (1953). Translated by E. Anscombe. Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1997.

    Cited by article

  79. Wollheim, R. (1984). Art, Interpretation, and the Creative Process. New Literary History. Vol. 15, No. 2, Interrelation of Interpretation and Creation, 241-253.

    Cited by article